Change Your World-NOT your Body

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

What does Radical Feminism Want from Transgenders?


This post is a follow up post to Radical Feminists-Transgender Activists and Speakers Corner-a Reflection of RadFem Impotency. The reason for this post is to address a red herring that has been circulated by RadFems/RadFem supporters. The red herring came AFTER accurate accounts/rightful criticism of the Speakers Corner drama was vomited all over social media. You can read my previous post for a full account of the wasteful drama.

The red herring that I'm speaking of can be seen here in this video.

This isolated clip shows an angry male (Mr Ponytail) transgender/trans supporter intimidatingly staring down a female transgender/trans supporter till she moves off and he is further calmed by another male transgender/trans supporter.

This clip has nothing to do with or reveals anything further over the incident concerning Maria M going over into the trans camp taking pictures at first, then physically violating various transgenders/trans supporters personal space second, then swinging one such transgender/trans supporter around like a rag doll after Maria's camera was snatched at, after which another transgender/trans supporter struck at/swiped at Maria M while trying to rescue their friend from Maria's forceful grip.

The above video is being used as a look-here-not-there ploy/redirect to stir up Radical Feminists and other Women. By focusing on this young man's anger, we can forget all about the woman's actions that lead to his getting angry in the first place!

But even if we allow ourselves to fall for swamp land being sold; males are/commit violence (nothing new or shocking there), with relations to transgender transition, what exactly are Radical Feminists and RadFem supporters saying with this example?
  • Anyone with a violent past shouldnt be allowed to transition?
  • Anyone who commits a violent act should have their transition revoked?
  • Transition is acceptable as long as you show no signs of anger or violence?
  • Transition causes violence so it should be banished as a psychiatric treatment?
  • Transition is acceptable as long as you show no signs of anger or violence against women?
  • Male transition is okay so long as they do nothing to piss off RadFems/RadFem supporters?
  • Transitioning children is okay because they're to young to be violent? 
  • Only females should be allowed to transition?
As Radical Feminists/RadFem supporters are so adamant about biology having little to do with human behaviour (non-essentialism), are they upset that biological males (trans males) under the guise of woman have made more legal leaps and bounds within a handful of years than Het Women have made in 5,000 years?

Are Radical Feminists/RadFem supporters upset that the majority of transgender action oriented criticism is being directed and lead by biological males (trans males)?

Are Radical Feminists/RadFem supporters upset that despite Het females being the primary caretakers of children/teens and young adults, that after puberty, male successes far out number female successes? (Meaning according to Radical Feminism, Het females are responsible for what they call-Patriarchy and Patriarchy is according to Radical Feminismwhat stops Het females from succeeding, therefore Het females are responsible for males/male violence/male sexuality and female weakness/ineffectiveness.) 

Okay, before letting the point get away from me, once again going back to the menacing looking transgender male/trans supporter, by calling him out for looking angry or even attributing angry/violence to males (trans or not), what has been accomplished by Radical Feminists/RadFem supporters stating the obvious? Nothing. A waste of time and energy for the sole purpose of garnering attention by a handful of attention whores who arent invested in the mental health/health of those who have transitioned or are seeking it.

dirt

Share:

Saturday, September 16, 2017

Radical Feminists-Transgender Activists and Speakers Corner-a Reflection of RadFem Impotency


A few days ago an incident (between Transgender activists/supporters and Radical Feminists/supporters) occurred at Speakers Corner where a discussion/debate was to be held regarding the Gender Recognition Act of 2004 called:
At this point, due to said incident, anything and everything else discussed at this function has been made incidental by both sides.

As someone who clearly doesnt favour either side, because lets face it, Transgenderism and Radical Feminism are opposite sides of the same coin, for those interested in an objective view, read on.

If you are not familiar with what happened, the main social media headlines read something like 4 trans activists attack 60 year old woman at Speakers Corner. But what REALLY happened? There are numerous pictures and videos of the attack, some more clear than others. Having at this point I think, seen everything out there, its obvious from the first videos to the latest what happened.

There were groups of people milling around, mostly on one side (Transgender) or the other side (Radical Feminist) with the odd flake flitting to and fro. Both camps were chanting various things, but clearly what Trans Activists/supporters were chanting irked this particular RadFem-(Maria M)  compelling her to walk over to the Trans Camp and record/take direct pictures of them without their consent. Maria you can clearly see on the right taking pics:
Trans Activists/supporters try to place their poster in front of Maria M to no avail, because Maria shoves her camera past and into the Trans crowd:
Personally, if someone shoved an unwanted camera in my face, they better be prepared to get their camera smashed to pieces. Moving on...one Trans Activists/supporters goes after Maria's camera as she smugly walks away:
A scrap ensues between Maria and a Trans Activist/supporter:
Maria yanks the Trans Activist/supporter off the ground and then chokes the shit out of them:
Then Maria shakes the shit of of the Trans Activist/supporter:
During this fight/scuffle over Maria's camera, at varying times another Trans person flitting around, at first trying to stop Maria's picture taking, then full out smacking/punching at Maria in effort to get Maria to release their friend:
Maria loosens her grip, the camera gets tossed to the ground and the two camps disperse. The Twitter attention Maria M went after with her camera erupts in attention over her "attack" by Trans Activists/supporters. Basically, it is what we have seen occur between Transgender and Radical Feminists for the last forty years and what takes place on social media hundreds of times a day. Radfem (girl) baits/hits/goes after Transgender (boy) and Transgender (boy) chases RadFem (girl) then RadFem (girl) runs screaming for help. The story is as old as the Heterosexual hills, that some of these boys claim to be girls, changes nothing-biology will out.

Maria didnt asked to be physically hit, but she most certainly DID trespass personal (physical) boundaries of those already deemed emotionally unstable. If you kick at a rapid dog, there is a good chance you are going to get bit. That doesnt make you a victim, nor does it mean you are asking for it, but it does make you look stupid. Maria and her new found (temporary) mostly Het female fan base however desire her victimhood status. Maria flat out started the incident and predominantly had and maintained control throughout, despite a few swipes and a broken camera.

We have all growing up been in scraps with someone where there is no clear winner and winning a scrap is based on who got the best of who. Clearly Maria got the best of one particular Trans Activist/supporter and fared best throughout the whole incident, yet all we hear from her and her camp is Maria as VICTIM VICTIM VICTIM. Why does Maria and other Radical Feminists so desire her/the status of victim? Is this suppose to suddenly make the Psychiatric community go "hey Trans males are violent and violent against Women, even older Women, we should stop transitioning them, stop letting them use Womens facilities etc?"! Obviously that makes no logical sense, nor is it going to happen and the whole of why anyone was there at Speakers Corner is forgot, eclipsed by needless drama.

Males and Trans Males have and are changing real laws that allow and promote the proliferation of Transgender (self/parental) diagnosis in children as early as months old, while Radical Feminists play Girl/Boy games for attention. Since Homosexuality remains the foundation for public and private Transgender notions, Homosexual adults have been grist for Trans mills and Homosexual children are daily becoming grist. And except for a few of us, this knowledge doesnt warrant a even whisper from Radical Feminist lips let alone a well deserved scream. Not unless that is, dramafied attention seeking RadFems can milk it for personal gain.

dirt


Share:

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Boots of Leather Slippers of Gold-Another Chapter in UnSTRAIGHTening Lesbian

This post is meant to serve as a precursor to our (Mrs Dirt and myself) next step in our UnSTRAIGHTening Lesbian series. Mrs Dirt's precursor post can be found here: Why Most Published “Lesbian Research” Is Completely Unrecognizable to Real Lesbians.

The following excepts come from one of the WORST examples of  Lesbian history, particularly Butch/Femme history, that has ever been recorded, bar NONE! In the next UnSTRAIGHTening Lesbian series we will fully dissect Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community

Remember, what you will see below doesnt even measure a drop in the bucket of ignorance filling this book cover to cover. According to our STRAIGHTBIAN authors and their male and STRAIGHTBIAN subjects Lesbianism consisted solely of roles such as:
Butches and Femmes (fems according to our derisory duo) specifically modeled their behaviour on:
 For example:
The butches found in this piss poor excuse of Lesbian history also:
While Butch Lesbians were rocking their soft everyday blouses, what were Femmes busy doing according to leather slipper boots?:
Those Femmes knew their places back in the day!

All this ROLE PLAYING though was not for naught, Lesbian ROLE PLAYING was REALLY used according to our Hetsplaining half-wits as a tool of RESISTANCE! HUH?
I'm sure the use of the ineffectual STRAIGHTBIAN better known as Simone de Beauvoir helped to sell you that last bit of swamp land! NOT!

There are several things abundantly clear from these few screencaps;




Share:

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Trans Trending-Who is Transitioning-How Today's Trans Teens are Identical to Yesterday's



Jackson-TransMiserable

Mack-TransPiteous

Sab-TransPitiful

Nate-TransMisfortunate

Hale-TransHapless

Vik-TransMasochist

Eli-TransLonely

Roc-TransAnguish

Jay-TransAche

The more things change, the more things stay the same-a truer saying couldnt be made about the Transgender experience.

The sister (Maura Liebman) of a 17 year old trans female (David Liebman) posted in the F-M newsletter Metamorphosis in 1982 lovingly writes:
David writes in the same newsletter to the newsletter's editor Rupert Raj:
David, like so many of todays Lesbian teens, sexually abused Het teen Girls and various emotionally needy/socially awkward/wayward Girls, hoped/believed transition would soothe/smooth and fix her troubled young life.

What became of 17 year old David Liebman? Did she find the comfortableness, happiness and spiritual joy she so desperately desired, and most certainly deserved, at the end of a needle filled with testosterone or a surgeon's scalpel? Is David living all her dreams somewhere with a husband or a wife, with children and a pet dog?

After a little digging, I found the answer to those questions in a recent Transgender anthology put together by the same Trans activist (Rupert Raj) who created Metamorphosis:


Looking further into the anthology, Rupert Raj confirms David's cause of death just a year and a half after she first contacted Rupert Raj in a poem Raj wrote:

 
Stories like David Liebman's are tragically more the norm than the exception, and even where suicide is not outright accomplished, it is often tried or thought deeply about and not before transition begins, but after! Unfortunately because Transgender transition is based in covering/hiding whats real, the suicide attempts, suicides, depressions and health scares that go hand in hand with being Transgender go hidden as well. Unlike David Liebman who thanks to Rupert Raj and David's sister, a tiny tragic footprint remains of her, or rather the her buried with transition. Maura Lieman also wrote this poem for her sister David:
Regrettably I'm sure, Maura realised too late, all the love in the world cannot save someone in the throws of transition and someone in the throws of transition cannot truly feel loved.

dirt


Share:

Friday, August 25, 2017

Kylea Taylor's Homophobic SoulCollage Has NO Soul

 
Yesterday Mrs Dirt received a WAY out odd email from (Het)Marriage and (Het)Family Therapist/SoulCollage president and author of
 Kylea Taylor (who is neither ethical nor caring-to Lesbians that is) that reads as follows:
Hi Anna,

I read your blog and support you speaking out and telling your truth, but since that Twitter account is not about SoulCollage® per se I wonder if you could just remove reference to SoulCollage® or your being a SoulCollage® Facilitator on that site? My concern is having your SoulCollage® credentials listed on the account where a lot of angry postings are might make people feel unsafe to do SoulCollage®. In the Training we ask that people only use the trademark "SoulCollage®" on the specific pages where the work is described, according to the Principles of SoulCollage®. I know you said on your blog that  

"I will continue to speak up, to speak out, and to stand in solidarity with other Lesbians & with gay men, but I plan to try to do so in a way that doesn’t tear others down and create unnecessary angst/division.

and that is great, we support that mission, but the conversations don't seem to concern SoulCollage® per se and it might be better for SoulCollage® work (yours and other Facilitators' in general) if we could prevent people connecting SoulCollage® inadvertently with any of those pretty ugly postings from others. Can you let me know if this makes sense to you?

Warm regards,
Kylea
A little back story, Mrs Dirt had been affiliated with SoulCollage work for about five years. The founder Seena Frost had become a personal hero of Mrs Dirt's and likewise Mrs Dirt became involved (personally/emotionally and financially) with SoulCollage. So to get this VERY odd and unexpected email from the current president Kylea Taylor, Mrs Dirt was a combo of puzzled, shocked and angry not to mention HURT. Puzzled because Kylea Taylor makes clear Mrs Dirt's Lesbian truths are not the Hetsplained Lezbophobic notions held by Kylea Taylor. Shocked because she did not expect to find any degree, let alone a GREAT degree of Homophobia/Lezbophobia within SoulCollage. Angry because she so fervently believed in something that now drips red with Homophobia/Lezbophobia! And hurt for all of the above!

Despite the jaggedness of the email (Kylea Taylor mentions Mrs Dirt's Blog, quotes from her blog then mentions her Twitter account. Which is it hun?) Mrs Dirt did her best to comply with Kylea Taylor demands, by removing any and all SoulCollage references from herself anywhere. Confusing also was Kylea Taylor stating some person some place some where some time in time MIGHT read a Tweet or blog post Mrs Dirt wrote and might suddenly cease any potential interest (given that is they even heard of SoulCollage) in becoming a paid member of SoulCollage. HUH? In other words, Kylea Taylor is directly BLAMING Mrs Dirt for "ugly comments" to Mrs Dirt from strangers on the internet!!! Not an email saying she is sorry Mrs Dirt is getting dumped on/shit on by Homophobic assfucks! Not a message of stay strong and fight the good fight! Nothing about being a respected SoulCollage member I'm here for you if you ever need to talk. No! Instead its a big fucking GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM US YOU SICK FUCKING LEZZIE BITCH!

Moving on, Mrs Dirt responded accordingly:
Okay, I've attempted to remove all traces of my connection to SoulCollage® from my blog, Twitter, Facebook (I didn't have SC listed anywhere on my FB profile, but I belonged to a couple of SC groups, which I just left), and LinkedIn. 
Please double-check, and please let me know if I have missed anything. 
The one thing I couldn't figure out how to do is how to remove my profile/account on the SoulCollage website.
It appears that my profile may have already been removed and/or that I have been partially locked out of my account (I can still log in, but it won't let me see my own profile, plus, when I Google my profile link, it is gone). 
(See screencap; this is what I see when I am logged in and try to see my own profile). 
Can you please advise me on how to get that done? Thanks.
PS: I believe my SC Circle membership expires in November of this year, so I have paid through that date to have my profile listed as a facilitator. 
Since it appears that my profile has been removed/hidden from your website and is therefore unavailable on all searches (I signed out and searched on different browsers ~ Chrome, Firefox, IE ~ and my profile is not available on any of them), I truly believe I deserve a partial refund for the time that my profile has been unavailable ~ but please donate it to the SoulCollage® Scholarship Fund (or whatever other charity you choose). Thanks, Anna :-)
Bear in mind, just the day before Mrs Dirt was in her SoulCollage account! Kylea Taylor's sugary BS response:
Hi Anna,
Thanking for taking the SoulCollage® trademark off the Twitter account which is not about SoulCollage® and where you are doing some good activism re helping people understand sexual preference issues, but yet are unfortunately attracting some comments that make the site feel unsafe for prospective SoulCollagers. I really appreciate your understanding that issue. 
Your profile is on the site, but you did not check the box that says you want it to appear to the public, so it does not appear. We have that option so that people can go on and off of appearing publicly when they want to. If you do want it to appear to the public, I am happy to check that box for you. Let me know. We want you to continue to be a SoulCollage® Facilitator if you are still interested in doing that work, and there is no problem with you advertising your SoulCollage® work in conjunction with your psychology work in a way that creates a safe climate for those attracted to going deeply into self-discovery; it was just the Twitter account that was not in alignment because of the posts of others. 
Let me know if you want your profile to appear on the site.
Thanks again for responding so quickly, and warm regards,
Kylea
I'm not sure how fucking dumb this Kylea Taylor is, but my wife is a fucking genius and intelligent enough to know having access to your profile and having your profile viewable to others are two different things! How the fuck can you check or uncheck when the fucking profile no longer exists to log the fuck into!
 AND if Twitter was the issue, WHY IN THE FUCK did Kylea Taylor first and foremost mention Mrs Dirt's BLOG and THEN quote from said BLOG?! And IF you had some doubts about any Homophobia/Lezbophobia in Kylea Taylor's first email, the sexual preference reference is a HUGE red flag! According to Kylea Taylor herself, the problem was ugly or angry comments by other people. Where, and more importantly WHY, would sexual preference be brought up?


Mrs Dirt's response back to that email:
Hi again, Thanks for your prompt reply. 
(Before I go on, this point is off-topic, and please know that I truly don't mean to be argumentative, but I would like to mention that the preferred phrase is "orientation", not "preference", because preference implies it's just a choice, like "preferring" chocolate versus vanilla ice cream when you would eat either one). 
I am wondering whether anyone specifically reported "feeling unsafe" to do SoulCollage®, based on my Twitter profile/activities? I know you wouldn't give me details (and I'm not even asking for details), but I am very curious, because you have mentioned people "feeling unsafe" to do SoulCollage® twice ~ and that is a very unusual, and a very specific, phrase.
I don't recall ever setting my profile to "private", and even if I had inadvertently set the profile to "private"I am still puzzled why that would not allow me to see/edit my own profile (I mean, when I am signed in to my SoulCollage® account). 
Anyway, I really think it's best for all concerned for me to sever any connection with SoulCollage® now; I honestly feel very uncomfortable being a part of an organization that is obviously quite concerned about being affiliated with me.
I would appreciate if you could remove my profile/account from the SoulCollage® website, please.
Thanks, Anna :-)
And the last response from SoulCollage's resident/president Homophobe Kylea Taylor to Mrs Dirt for the clincher reads:
Hi Anna, Thanks for educating me about the terms to use (i.e., sexual orientation rather than sexual preference). I appreciate your taking the time to do that.
I did get an email from a Facilitator who was worried whether followers to your Twitter account would feel safe re: SoulCollage®. It is such a hard call to make. Truth on social media can call up rough responses and it is hard to create a safe environment sometimes on the web where you don't have the same control of a safe container as one would in therapy or a workshop.
The default setting in our profile settings is for the profile not to be public. We have it that way so that the Facilitator must check a box consciously to appear on the web. Some people don't want to be -- they might have a life that they keep separate from SoulCollage® for some reason.
(Clearly IGNORING here what Mrs Dirt said ie there is no profile to get into!)
I am truly sorry you want to sever your connection with SoulCollage®. To be clear again, we just wanted to keep the SoulCollage® name on a page about SoulCollage® and to separate that part of your work from the page where people are responding to your lifestyle with lots of judgments and homophobia. That in my mind is very different from concern about being affiliated with you.
You have asked twice and so I will remove your account in a few days if I don't hear from you. If you want to still receive the Neter Letter and other mail, we can leave you on the mailing list which is separate from your account.
Warm regards,
Kylea
Even after Mrs Dirt corrects her Homophobic ignorance, Kylea Taylor (for the win) calls Mrs Dirt's BIOLOGICAL nature a fucking "lifestyle"! SoulCollage is a lifestyle! Veganism is a lifestyle! Body building is a lifestyle! Neo Nazism is a lifestyle! How your brain and body organically function is NOT a FUCKING LIFESTYLE! Unless you are so fucking ignorant as to think the tree growing in your front yard is a lifestyle! Or the Earth revolving around the fucking sun is lifestyle! OR unless you are a flat out sick fucking HOMOPHOBE! Which by the way is exactly what Kylea Taylor is.

Whether she knows it or whether its lurking within her SOUL, Kylea Taylor despises Gays and Lesbians! And once Mrs Dirt's being a Lesbian came to her attention, Mrs Dirt was (in true homophobic fashion) swiftly dealt with!

If you are a Gay male or a Lesbian and are affiliated with SoulCollage in any way shape or form, you might want to consider where your hard earned Homosexual dollars are going. If you are Gay or Lesbian and have thought about joining SoulCollage, think again!

As an interesting aside, lets take a brief glimpse at one of Kylea Taylor's prime mentors/heros Stanislav Grof. Kylea Taylor has this to say about her mentor:
Now lets take a look at what Kylea Taylor's GOD has to say about us Homosexuals:
 Also male homosexuality seems to be related meaningfully to the birth trauma, especially to the third perinatal matrix. The fear of female genitals, explained in psychoanalysis by the castration complex based on infantile fantasies about vagina as a dangerous organ (vagina dentata) seems to be on a deeper level related to the biological fact that the female genital is a potentially murderous instrument that was once actually a source of agony and vital threat. It can not, therefore, become a source of sexual pleasure (obviously this guy has never been to a fag bar at 2am!) if the unconscious memory of birth is too vivid. The fear of heterosexual sex was in these patients often accompanied by a deep craving for warm non-genital contact with the maternal figure on a very primitive level (anaclitic needs).
As far as female homosexuality is concerned it appears to be more superficial; in LSD treatment it could usually be traced back to deep levels of COEX systems and BPM IV. Deep roots for Lesbian needs and tendencies seemed to be in unsatisfied craving for close contact between mother and daughter during early infancy and the association between the oral genital contact and the orgiastic release at birth. (He means we smelled/tasted our mother's pussy on the way out and developed a taste for it) In addition, very important traumatic memories could usually be recovered in which the male sexual object was associated with danger, guilt or humiliation.
The obsessive-compulsive neurosis seems to have the deepest roots in BPM III. The fact that conflicts in regard to homosexuality and aggression as well as inhibition of genitality belong to the most important problems found in these patients, is in good agreement with this assumption. The relation of homosexuality to birth anxiety was already demonstrated above. The inhibition of genitality seems to be in the last analysis due to a similarity between the pattern of sexual orgasm and negative aspects of the third perinatal matrix. Thus attempts to control aggression and anxiety bound to this matrix inhibit also the pattern of sexual response.
Clearly that Homophobic/Lezbophobic apple, Kylea Taylor, didnt fall far from the vile putrid nauseous Homosexual hating tree Stan Grof!

dirt
Share:

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Self Hating Dykes and Why they Date STRAIGHTBIANS


Mrs Dirt and I have written both individually about STRAIGHTBIANS and written jointly about them. We have written about the many dangers STRAIGHTBIANS pose for Lesbians and highlighted different categories of STRAIGHTBIAN Het Women might fall into. So to be fair, this post will discuss Lesbians who actively seek/date/partner with STRAIGHTBIANS, because after all, it takes two to Tango!

Dykes that seek out/prefer/demand a STRAIGHTBIAN, fortunately are NOT the rule of Dyke thumbs, BUT they do aid in harming directly/indirectly all Lesbians to a degree. What sort of Dyke would willingly want to date a Het Woman? Unfortunately due to the combo of growing up in a world that despises Homosexuals, lack of visible Lesbian role models of all Lesbian ranges and accurate Lesbian information, Lesbians that develop a preference for STRAIGHTBIANS isnt completely cut and dry.

That being said, despite all the difficulties in being a Dyke, why would a Dyke prefer a STRAIGHTBIAN over another Dyke?
  • Society is greatly to blame here. As a Dyke, we naturally are attracted to other Dykes, and we usually have a specific type of Dyke that REALLY attracts us. The problem is, nearly ALL and sometimes ALL the females in or around our lives are Straight. We may have a preference for pizza, but if the ONLY thing ever on the menu is Hamburger, we take the burger rather than starve! My point here, lack of visible Lesbians can most definitely confuse some Lesbians into accepting Het Women as the only desirable females available.
  • When Dykes go from simply "crushing" on Girls and begin being interested in dating/relationships our entire repertoire on dating/marriage has been /informed by Heterosexuals! Most Lesbians look to Het Males on how to ACT around Het Women. Dykes who employ male tactics in hopes of getting a girlfriend usually attract a Het female! Most Lesbians figure this stuff out quite early and move on and into real Lesbian love/relationships, but for some insecure Dykes, they never move past Heterosexual play acting. 
  • These particular Dykes psychologically DEPEND on STRAIGHTBIANS to reflect back the (mannish) image they have of themselves. Dating another Lesbian would strip them of the acceptable Heterosexuality they struggle to recreate/create.
  • If one of these Dykes actually winds up dating another Dyke, she will subtly and sometimes outright suggest/demand her Lesbian partner be/act or dress more feminine, ie more Straight.
On a personal level, I have known throughout my adult like various Dykes who date Straight. Dykes who have sought some kind of friendships with me, only to be taken aback when they found I did not share the Het male ideas (bear in mind most males do not share their ideas either) of females that they did. When I've encountered these Dykes who are looking for a Butch buddy of sorts, they have always been left disappointed I did nothing to further their Het fantasies of butch bonding.

Femme friends, including my wife have had similar experiences with the Lesbians discussed above. When telling me about a few particular Dykes Mrs Dirt had known personally, she even used the same word I had when describing h
er own failure to meet the Hetero expectations of said Dykes; disappointed!

So while there are clear and specific reasons STRAIGHTBIANS will claim/date Lesbians, there are a small percentage of Lesbians that willingly seek out STRAIGHTBIANS. Dykes whose entire fabricated image of themselves is dependent on STRAIGHTBIANS. Dykes whose ego for varying reasons, failed to develop and mature beyond the Heterosexualism they aspire.

dirt


Share:

Friday, August 18, 2017

Trans Trending Who is Transitioning STILL!


Cam-Straight Girl

Az-Straight Girl 

Em-Straight Girl 

Tim-Straight Girl

Evan-Straight Girl

Ess-Straight Girl

Chia Straight Girl

Dan-Straight Girl 

JC-Straight Girl

Lesbians transition for reasons usually associated with fear/discomfort with Hetero-Dysphoria and Homophobia.

The growing number of Het females transitioning are a direct response to transition being used as a cure-all for female mental distress/Het female masochistic emotional default and cries for HELP beyond yesterday's eating disorders, sexual promiscuity or cutting.

And so long as transition has a green light, disturbed Het female youths are going to seek HELP in all the wrong places. Only HELP from a needle merely fills the bloodstream with different ills and HELP from surgeon's knife simply carves greater troubles.

dirt

Share:
Copyright © The dirt from Dirt | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Distributed By Blogger Templates20